The Coming IT Revolution

Gartner recently published their report “Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2022.”  End-of-year summaries and next year’s forecasts that fill inboxes this time of year are often discounted.  But this report was significant in that the identified trends suggest a significant shift in the tech culture. 

Among the trends identified by Gartner was a shift away from siloed applications where the infrastructure and processes needed to support applications are treated as independent needs toward a networked architecture where data, security, cloud, and privacy needs are managed cohesively across the entire enterprise.  The need for such a shift was echoed by multiple speakers at last month’s IoT World Conference.  The speakers discussed the need to reimagine existing data infrastructures in order to shift to horizontal platforms that better serve the enterprise.  Such a systemic restructuring requires enterprises to adopt a layered structure or a tech stack that compartmentalizes functionality and increases data visibility across the organization.  This leads to a more trusted approach to IT by increasing access to data and tools.  Ultimately, data utilization and collaboration are improved and the organization increases its return on investment.

Another highlighted trend is based on a movement toward a more dynamic applications environment.  The last few years have shown that nimble organizations are better able to adapt to changing business conditions.  Organizational agility can only be achieved if the IT organization is able to deliver in the face of evolving requirements if its toolkit includes composable applications, automation tools, business intelligence systems, and configurable artificial intelligence.  As IT evolves away from the idea of an all-encompassing application that limits adaptability, they are (1) adopting new systems that treat applications as a series of functional modules that can be restructured as needs change, (2) managing data as dynamic data flows that provide the freedom to rebalance data distribution systems as necessary, and (3) deploying rule-driven systems that allow insight advancement based on derived insights. 

Trending data also demonstrate that organizations are moving to embrace technologies that serve to adapt to the desired user experiences.  This trend represents a shift away from systems that might improve operational efficiencies if it comes at the cost of the human experience.  The days of deploying technologies that require organizational changes or significant employee retraining exercises are coming to a close as organizations embrace systems that enhance desired customer and employee experiences.  Technologies are emerging that support the needs of a distributed organizational structure.  Tools that emphasize customer (and employee) experiences are becoming expectations rather than desires.  And active intelligence systems that are able to process data and directly impact operational processes are supplanting systems that first capture data, mining the data for insights, and then recommend management action. 

The trends identified in the report go well beyond references to technology that an organization can purchase and deploy in an effort to achieve incremental process improvement.  They represent a new IT philosophy about how data systems are architected, operationalized, and perceived by the organization as a whole. 

IT function is continuing to evolve away from its roots as a service function to become an important component of any organization’s strategic mission.  Recent events have accelerated this migration in that the strategic objectives of any organization are either enhanced or limited based on the capabilities of the IT organization.  The trends identified by Gartner signify an acceleration of this movement.  Once these technologies are more fully deployed, the IT function further shifts from the role of being a key strategic advisor to the organization to being a much more active member of the management team.   IT is effectively shifting from being a strategic enabler (or inhibitor) of the organization to becoming a primary actor on the stage of future business.

Who Can You Trust with Your IoT Data?

No single entity can install enough IoT devices, systems, and applications to cover everything needed. As a result, entities must collaborate in two areas. The first area is interoperability. You would have never been able to enjoy Wi-Fi, Ethernet, Bluetooth, and many other technologies if equipment, connectivity, and service providers would not have put the effort to establish interoperability among their products and communication protocols. But it is the second area that this article focuses on: TRUST.
Can one provider trust another provider with your data?
The consequences of your data falling to the wrong hands could be devastating, and in some cases, could even pose threat to life and business viability. The level of trust you must have in another entity correlates, and must compensate for your perception of the risk that you might incur if that entity mishandles your data.
My definition of trust helps here: trust is your willingness to accept the potential negative consequences of giving control over something you have to someone (or something) else.
So, how do you know if you can trust another entity with your data?
To answer this question, I would turn to my model of trustworthiness, and the 6 components of it.
First, is the other organization competent in handling your data? Have they shown the ability to maintain data security in the past? Do they have the capability and the skills to continue and do that? If applicable, are they, their products, or their services appropriated certified to maintain data security?
Second, does the other organization share your values? What is their motivation for collaborating and interoperating with you? Are they driven by the same values and motivations as your organization, or are they driven by values that oppose those of your organization? “Marriage of convenience” could blow up in your face, when conflicting motivations rise to the surface. You must assure that your values are aligned with those you wish to trust.
Third, is the relationship symmetrical? Data that flows only in one direction is asymmetrical and may lead to breaches in trust. On the other hand, if data flow between the two organizations is symmetrical, trust will be maintained at a higher level. Keep my information safe and I’ll keep your information safe. Symmetry is a powerful motivator for trustworthiness.
Once you analyzed the other organization through these first three components, you would be able to determine whether you can (or cannot) fundamentally trust them. Don’t share information if the other organization cannot be trusted through the analysis of those three components.
The next three components come to play through the ongoing relationship with the other organization, because trust is dynamic. It increases (or declines) with every interaction and, although not as fast, in between interactions. In fact, it will decline faster with negative interactions than it would increase with positive ones. Just like people are much more inclined to post negative reviews if they had negative experiences than they are to post positive reviews if they had positive experiences. Bad is much stronger than good.
The other organization is made of people, and people are (or are not) trustworthy, which would make their entire organization trustworthy (or not). How they interact with you would allow you to determine their trustworthiness. The three components of every interaction are the positivity of the interaction, the length and frequency of interactions, and the intimacy of those interactions. The more direct, transparent, no-BS your interaction counterpart is, the more you can trust them. The more frequently you meet with them, and the longer you meet with them, the more you can tell if you can trust them or not. In a similar way, the higher the intimacy of your interactions are (more face-to-face, less email), the more you can tell if you can trust them.
While there is almost nothing you can do beyond judging the competence or values of the other organization, or the symmetry of your relationship, there is a lot you can do to determine their trustworthiness and build trust between you and them through interacting with them more frequently, for longer time, and more intimately.
Finally, remember that as much as you may need to trust them with your data, they must trust you with theirs. Building trust does not happen when you demand another person (or organization) to behave in a way that will earn your trust. It happens when you behave in a way that will earn theirs.

The author is the CEO of the Innovation Culture Institute LLC and the author of The Book of Trust and twelve other books and 300 articles. He was named one of the top 20 thought leaders on organizational culture by Thinkers 360. Find out more at www.yoramsolomon.com